<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Thiel on WNTRDEV.BLOG</title>
    <link>https://blog.wntrdev.ca/tags/thiel/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Thiel on WNTRDEV.BLOG</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:39:26 -0400</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.wntrdev.ca/tags/thiel/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Palantir and Fascism</title>
      <link>https://blog.wntrdev.ca/posts/palantir/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:39:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.wntrdev.ca/posts/palantir/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;accelerationist-ceos-and-the-tech-state-corporate-fusion&#34;&gt;Accelerationist CEOs and the tech-state-corporate fusion&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Previously published on LinkedIn&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;April 29, 2026&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Palantir&amp;rsquo;s 22-point manifesto is being debated as either technofascism or corporate cringe. Both readings miss what the document actually does.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is it fascist? Yes, on Griffin&amp;rsquo;s palingenetic criterion, Paxton&amp;rsquo;s mobilizing-passions frame, and most of Eco&amp;rsquo;s Ur-Fascism checklist. Axis rehabilitation is an unusually explicit tell. The mass-movement base and the Führerprinzip are absent, which is why technofascism, or neoreactionary techno-imperialism, tracks better than 1933 analogies. The intellectual lineage clearly runs Schmitt to Strauss to Thiel to Yarvin.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
